TechDaily.ai

techdaily.ai, your source for technical information. This podcast is sponsored by Stonefly, your trusted solution provider and adviser in enterprise storage, backup, disaster recovery, hypercon converged and VMware, HyperV, Proxmox cluster, AI servers, and public and private cloud. Check out stonefly.com or email your project requirements to sales@ stonefly.com.
Okay, let's really dig into this. Today, uh we're breaking down some core ideas in machine learning and AI.
Yeah. Think of it like a cheat sheet maybe for the, you know, the building blocks of this whole field.
Exactly. We want to get past the buzzwords and uh really get those aha moments, make these complex things click, you know,
right? Not get bogged down, but understand the fundamentals. We'll use clear explanations, some relatable examples hopefully.
So, we're aiming to bring these concepts to life even without visuals. Uh where's a good place to start this journey? So many terms.
Well, I think a fundamental place is the data itself. We need to talk about variance,
right? Okay. Yeah. It's basically um a way to understand how spread out your data points are. You know, are they all clustered together or all over the place?
Ah, right. So, low variance means tightly grouped. High variance means scattered.
Exactly. And knowing that is really important. It tells you a lot about the data set's characteristics right off the bat. Helps you figure out what models might work, what patterns you might find.
Okay, that makes sense. Understanding the spread before you dive in. What about when you have data, but Uh well, no labels, no categories.
Ah, yeah. That takes us to unsupervised learning.
Unsupervised learning without labels.
Precisely. The algorithm has to figure things out on its own. Find structures, patterns, think about things like clustering,
grouping similar stuff together.
You got it. Or uh finding anomalies, spotting the data points that just look weird or different from everything else.
So, it's like the AI is discovering the categories itself without being told what they are.
That's the fascinating part. Yeah. It can uncover hidden relationships we didn't even know were there like finding different customer groups just by looking at buying habits.
Interesting. Okay. What if the order of the data matters? Like uh stock prices over time,
right? That's time series analysis. It's specifically for data that's ordered chronologically.
Okay.
The main goals there are often things like forecasting, predicting future values based on past ones and just identifying trends as they develop over time.
So the time aspect itself is a key piece of information.
Definitely. Now Imagine you've already built a model for one task.
You learned a lot. Can you reuse that knowledge?
Oh, like apply it to something new but kind of similar.
Exactly. That's transfer learning. It's a smart way to, you know, take what a model learned solving problem A and apply it to problem B. Saves a ton of time. Often boosts results, especially if you don't have much data for problem B.
That sounds really efficient. Like, uh, learning French helps you learn Spanish quicker.
Good analogy. Same principle. So, how do these models actually learn? How do they tweak themselves to get better?
Yeah. How do they find the best settings?
That usually involves optimization. And a really fundamental method is gradient descent.
Gradient descent. Heard of it?
Imagine you're on a hilly landscape blindfolded and you want to get to the lowest point.
Yeah.
Gradient descent is like taking small steps in the steepest downhill direction you can feel.
Ah, okay. Making small adjustments to minimize the error step by step.
Exactly. And then there's a variation called stochastic gradient descent.
Stochastic. How's that different?
Well, instead of looking at all the data to decide the next step. Stochcastic gradient descent or SGD just looks at one single data point or maybe a small batch.
Oh wow, just one.
Yeah, it's much faster per step, computationally cheaper. It makes the path down the hill a bit more uh jumpy, maybe more noisy, but often, especially with huge data sets, it gets you to a good spot much quicker overall.
Faster, but maybe a bumpier ride. Got it. Okay, shifting gears a bit. How do machines understand language like text,
right? That's the whole field of natural language processing or NLP.
NLP.
And one really common task within NLP is sentiment analysis.
Sentiment like figuring out if someone's happy or angry in a review.
Exactly. That is the text positive, negative, neutral. It uses NLP techniques to understand the opinions and emotions expressed. Super useful for businesses, you know, understanding customer feedback.
Yeah, I can see that. Okay, let's talk predictions. What are the main ways machines predict things.
Well, we often split it into two big categories. If you're predicting a number like a house price or uh temperature tomorrow, that's called regression.
Regression for numbers.
Yep. And a basic but important type is linear regression. That's basically trying to fit a straight line through your data points to model a relationship.
Finding the trend line. Okay.
Now, if you're predicting a category like is this email spam or not spam? Is this picture a cat or a dog? Beex classification
classification for category. Right? And a really common algorithm for yesnote type classification is logistic regression. It predicts the probability of something belonging to a specific class.
Okay. So regression for quantities, classification for labels. What about AI learning by like trial and error getting rewards.
Ah you're talking about reinforcement learning.
That's the one.
Yeah. Here you have an agent the AI interacting with an environment. It takes actions and based on those actions it gets rewards or maybe penalties. So it learns by doing.
Exactly. It tries to figure out the sequence of actions, the policy that gets it the most reward over time. Think about training a robot to walk or uh a game AI learning to play chess.
Cool. Okay. What about decision-m? Sometimes AI seems to follow a path of questions.
You're probably thinking of decision trees.
Decision trees, right?
They're a type of supervised learning where the model looks like well a tree. Each branch point is a question about a feature and voling the branches leaves you down to a final prediction or classification at a leaf node
like a flowchart for decisions
pretty much. But single decision trees can sometimes be a bit unstable or prone to overfitting.
So what do we do then?
We use a random forest,
a forest of trees.
Uh yeah, basically it's an ensemble method. You build lots of different decision trees, usually on slightly different subsets of the data or features, and then you combine their predictions.
How do you combine them?
For classification, you typically take a majority vote from all the trees. For ression you average their outputs. It makes the overall prediction much more robust and accurate.
Strength and numbers makes sense. Now, sometimes data is really complex, lots of dimensions or features. Can we simplify it?
Absolutely. We use dimensionality reduction techniques for that. Okay.
One simple idea is truncation. Just chopping off some features or data points, maybe the less important ones.
Seems a bit crude.
It can be. A more sophisticated method is principal component analysis or PCA. A PCA heard of that too.
PCA mathematically transforms your data into a new set of dimensions called principal components. These components are ordered by how much variance, how much information they capture from the original data.
So you can keep the most important new dimensions and discard the rest.
Exactly. You reduce the complexity, the dimensionality while trying to keep as much of the original signal, the essential information as possible.
Tidying up the data basically. What about training models? I've heard of training a model on a huge data set first before the real task.
Ah yes that's pre-training.
Pre-training.
The idea is you let a model learn general patterns and representations from a massive amount of say text or images first. Just general knowledge
like a foundation
precisely. Then you take that pre-trained model and fine-tune it on your specific smaller data set for the actual task you care about. It often gives you a big head start and better result especially if you don't have much labeled data for your specific problem. leveraging general knowledge for specific tasks. Smart. Okay, moving to vision. How do computers see things in images like find objects?
That's a core task in computer vision called object detection.
Object detection.
It's more than just saying there's a car in this image.
Mhm.
It's about identifying where the car is, usually by drawing a bounding box around it and what it is, assigning the label car.
Pinpointing and labeling. Okay. What if your data is unbalanced? Like way more examples of one class. than another.
Yeah, imbalanced data is a common problem. Algorithms can get biased towards the majority class. One technique to deal with it is oversampling.
Oversampling.
You basically create more copies of the examples from the minority class, the one you don't have enough of helps to balance things out so the model pays more attention to it.
Boosting the underdog class. Got it. And sometimes in data, you just find points that are way off. Really different.
Those are outliers.
Outliers.
Data points that just stand out from the crowd. deviate a lot from the general pattern. They could be errors or they could be genuinely interesting unusual events like fraud detection relies on finding outliers.
So signals or noise potentially how do we stop models from learning the training data too well including the noise.
Ah the classic problem of overfitting
right memorizing the test instead of learning the concepts.
Exactly. The model fits the training data perfectly even the random fluctuations but then it performs poorly on new data it hasn't seen. The goal is generalization performing well on unseen data.
We want models that generalize. Okay. How do we feed categories like red, blue, green into a model? They need numbers, right?
They do. A very common way is one hot encoding.
One hot.
Yeah. If you have say three colors, you create three new binary features. Zero or one.
For a red data point, the red feature is one and blue and green are zero. For blue, the blue feature is one. Others are zero and so on.
Turning categories into unique onoff switches. Clever. What if I have a new data point and I want to find similar ones in my data set?
That's nearest neighbor search.
Finding the neighbors.
Yep. Given your new point, the algorithm finds the Kang data points in the existing set that are closest to it based on some distance measure. Super useful for recommendations. Find users similar to you or searching for similar images.
Finding look alikes. Okay. The normal distribution, the bell curve. Why does that pop up so much in stats and ML?
Well, the normal distribution just happens to describe a lot of phenomena really well. Height, measurement errors, lots of things tend to cluster around a central value in that bellshape.
Okay.
And many statistical methods and some ML algorithms actually assume the data or the errors in the data are normally distributed. So knowing if your data looks like a bell curve can help you choose the right tools.
That familiar curve, what if my features have totally different scales like age in years and income in thousands of dollars?
That can definitely be a problem. Algorithms that use Distance, for example, might be dominated by the feature with the larger numbers.
So income would matter way more than age just because the numbers are bigger
potentially. Yes. That's why we use normalization or standardization. It's about rescaling your features so they're on a similar scale, maybe between zero and one or having a mean of zero and standard deviation of one.
Leveling the playing field for the features.
Exactly. It helps many algorithms perform better and converge faster.
Makes sense. We mentioned NLP earlier. Natural language processing. Can you give a slightly broader picture?
Sure. NLP is really about bridging the gap between human language and computers. It's a huge field. Computer science, AI, linguistics, all mixed together.
So computers understanding and using language,
right? Understanding text, interpreting speech, translating between languages, generating text, even having conversations with chat bots. All of that falls under NLP.
It's everywhere now. Okay. Simplifying data again. What's matrix factorization?
Think of a big table of data like users. and movie ratings. Matrix factorization tries to break that big table down into two or more smaller, simpler tables or matrices.
Why do that?
Often those smaller matrices reveal underlying hidden factors or dimensions. In the movie example, it might uncover genres or user preferences for certain types of actors without being explicitly told. It's used a lot in recommendation systems.
Finding the hidden structure. Cool. What if you're modeling sequences where the next step only depends on the current step? Like uh predicting the weather tomorrow based only on today's weather.
That sounds like a job for a Markoff chain.
Markoff chain.
It's a mathematical system for modeling sequences of events where the probability of the next event just depends on the state you're in right now, not the whole history of how you got there. Used for lots of things, modeling sequences, predicting states.
The recent past predicts the near future.
Okay. So, with all these algorithms, how do you pick the right one? And how do you know know if it's any good.
Good questions. That involves model selection and model evaluation.
Selection and evaluation.
Model selection is choosing the best algorithm for your specific problem and data. Model evaluation is measuring how well your chosen trained model actually performs critically on new data it hasn't seen before.
And tools help with this. You mentioned Jupyter notebooks.
Yeah, Jupyter notebooks are super popular interactive environments where data scientists can write code, run experiments, visualize data, and evaluate models on in one place makes the whole process much easier.
Trying things out and checking the results. We talked about transfer learning between related tasks. What if you apply knowledge from one field to a totally different one?
That broader idea is sometimes called knowledge transfer. It's about leveraging insights or techniques from domain A to help in domain B, even if they seem unrelated at first.
Like using image recognition techniques for analyzing medical scans.
Exactly like that. Finding ways to cross-pollinate ideas and methods across Ross different fields.
How do we represent facts and relationships in a structured way for AI like connecting concepts?
That's often done using knowledge graphs.
Knowledge graphs.
Think of it like a network diagram. You have nodes representing entities, people, places, concepts, and edges representing the relationships between them is a located in works for it captures structured knowledge in a way machines can query and reason over.
Mapping out knowledge connections. Okay. Basic probability. What's the chance of two things happening together?
That's called Joint probability. It measures the likelihood of the intersection of two or more events occurring. Fundamental for building models that understand how variables relate to each other.
The probability of A and B. Got it. When algorithms learn, they make assumptions, right, based on how they're built.
They absolutely do. That's called inductive bias.
Inductive bias.
It's the set of built-in assumptions or preferences an algorithm has that helps it generalize from the specific training examples it sees to new unseen data. Different algorithms have different biases. It shapes what they learn.
The algorithm starting point, it's worldview almost,
sort of. Yeah. What about getting specific facts out of messy text like pulling company names and locations from news articles?
Yeah. How does that work?
That's information extraction. It's about automatically identifying and pulling out structured pieces of information, entities, relationships, events from unstructured text or other sources.
Turning unstructured chaos into structured data. Okay, once a model is trained, what's the process of actually using it to make a prediction called?
That's inference.
Inference.
You take your train model, you feed it new data it's never seen before, and it applies what it learned to generate an output, a prediction, a classification, whatever its task is. It's putting the model to work.
Okay, we mentioned imbalanced data before. Why is it such a challenge? Again, the main issue is that standard algorithms often just learn to predict the majority class really well because that minimiz is is the overall error. They might almost completely ignore the rare minority class
even if the minority class is the important one like detecting a rare disease.
Exactly. So you need special techniques like oversampling or undersampling the majority class or using different evaluation metrics to make sure the model performs adequately on all classes.
Gotcha. What about bringing humans back into the picture? Combining human smarts with AI.
That's the human in the loop approach.
Human in the loop.
It means integrating human management at key points in the AI process. Maybe humans label tricky data or review the AI's uncertain predictions or provide feedback to help the model improve. It leverages the strengths of both.
Best of both worlds. Now, training these models, especially deep ones, takes a lot of compute power, right?
Oh, yeah. Hugely demanding.
So, what hardware helps?
The big one is graphics processing units, GPUs,
GPUs like for gaming.
The very same architecture designed for handling graphics calculations in parallel. turns out to be incredibly well suited for the matrix math that dominates deep learning. Using GPUs speeds up training dramatically compared to traditional CPUs.
Gaming tech powering AI.
Cool. Is there a problem in deep learning where the learning signal gets weaker further back in the network?
Yes, that's the vanishing gradient problem.
Vanishing gradient.
During training, especially in very deep networks, the error signals gradients that are propagated backward to update the network's weights can become smaller and smaller. If they get tiny, the early layers of the network barely learn anything.
So, the learning stalls
essentially, yes, it makes training very deep networks difficult, though techniques like LSTMs and residual connections were developed partly to address this.
Okay, we keep saying generalization is the goal. What really makes a model generalize? Well,
it's a combination of things. Good representative training data is key.
Choosing a model that's complex enough, but not too complex, avoiding overfitting,
using regularization, techniques helps and critically evaluating honestly on a separate test set.
So good data, right model complexity and honest testing.
That's a good summary. You wanted to capture the real underlying patterns, not just memorize the training examples,
right? What about AI creating things like generating new images?
That's often done using generative adversarial networks or GANs.
Gans, how do they work?
It's like a competition between two neural networks. One, the generator tries to create fake data like images. that looks real. The other, the discriminator, tries to tell the difference between the real data and the generator's fakes.
A forger and a detective.
Exactly. They train together, pushing each other to get better.
Yeah.
The generator learns to make increasingly convincing fakes, and the discriminator gets better at spotting them. The end result can be amazingly realistic generated data.
AI as an artist almost. We mentioned ensemble methods like random forests. Are there other ways to combine models?
Oh, yes. Bagging like in random forests. is one type. Another big one is boosting.
Boosting.
In boosting, you train models sequentially. Each new model focuses on correcting the mistakes made by the previous models. It builds up a strong predictor by combining many often simple weak learners. Add a boost and gradient boosting are examples.
Learning from mistakes iteratively. Got it. What if you have more than two categories to classify like classifying news articles into sports, politics, business, tech?
That's multi-class classification. multiclass.
Many algorithms like decision trees or logistic regression can be adapted for this. Often it involves strategies like training one classifier per class, one versus rest or training a classifier for every pair of classes, one versus one.
Handling more than just yes now. Okay, before any training happens, the data needs work, right? Cleaning it up
absolutely crucial. That whole stage is called data prep-processing. It covers everything from handling missing values, scaling features like we discussed with normalization, encoding categorical variables like one hot and coding, maybe dealing with outliers and splitting the data into training and testing sets. Garbage in, garbage out, you know,
get the foundation right. We talked about linear regression. What's the broader statistical field?
That's regression analysis. It's a whole suite of statistical techniques for modeling the relationship between a dependent variable, what you want to predict, and one or more independent variables, the predictors. Linear regression is just one type.
Understanding how variables relate statistically. Okay, the sigmoid function, we said it's squashes values to between 0ero and one for probability. Anything else?
Its main role is really that S-shaped curve mapping any input to that probability like range. It also introduces nonlinearity which is essential for neural networks to learn complex patterns. Without nonlinear functions like sigmoid or rayu, a deep network would just be linear.
The curve that makes probabilities and adds complexity. Are there ML approaches inspired by like evolution?
Yes, evolutionary algorithms.
Evolution. They're optimization techniques inspired by natural selection. You have a population of potential solutions and they evolve over generations through processes like selection, survival of the fittest, crossover, combining parts of good solutions, and mutation, random changes used for complex optimization problems.
Learning like nature does in NLP. How do models predict the next word? Like in autocomplete,
that's the job of language models.
Language models.
They learn the probability of quences of words occurring. Given a sequence of words, they can predict the most likely next word or calculate the probability of an entire sentence. They're fundamental to things like machine translation, text generation, speech recognition.
Understanding the statistics of language. We said back propagation is key for training neural networks. What's its core job again?
Back propagation is how the network learns from its errors. It calculates how much each weight in the network contributed to the final error. The gradient of the loss function with respect to the weights. and then updates those weights slightly in the direction that reduces the error. It propagates the error signal backward through the network.
The mechanism for adjusting the connections. We mentioned bagging reduces variance. Can you elaborate?
By training multiple models on different random samples of the data and averaging their predictions. Bagging smooths things out. Any single model might be overly sensitive to specific data points in its sample, but averaging across many models cancels out a lot of that noise and instability leading to lower variance and usually better generalization.
Averaging out the quirks, what are dense vectors? Why are they useful?
Okay, think of representing something like a word. You could use one hot encoding, but that vector would be huge and sparse, mostly zeros. A dense vector, often learned by the model, like word embeddings, represents the word in a much shorter vector where most elements are non zero.
Shorter but richer.
Exactly. And the cool thing is that the position in this dense vector space often captures semantic meaning. Words with similar meanings tend to have similar vectors. It's a powerful way to represent complex things numerically.
Encoding meaning in numbers. How do we make data easier for models to understand? Like creating better input features.
That's the art and science of feature engineering.
Feature engineering.
It's about using your domain knowledge and creativity to transform raw data into features that are more informative and relevant to the problem. Maybe combining features, creating ratios, extracting parts of dates. Good features can make a huge difference. to model performance. It's often where a lot of the effort goes.
Crafting the best possible inputs. Okay. Support vector machines, SVMs. What's their main idea for classification?
SVMs try to find the best possible boundary or hyperplane to separate the different classes in your data.
The best boundary.
Yeah. Specifically, the one that has the largest possible margin, the biggest gap between the boundary line and the closest data points of each class. Those closest points are called the support vectors and they define the boundary. It's often very effective. especially in high dimensions.
Finding the maximum separation. How do we reliably check how well a model will do on totally new data beyond just a single test set?
That's where cross validation comes in. It's a more robust evaluation technique.
Cross validation, how does it work?
You divide your training data into say five or 10 folds or subsets. Then you train the model five or 10 times. Each time you train on all folds except one and test on the fold you held out.
So each part gets a turn at being the test set.
Exactly. Then you average the performance across all those runs. It gives you a much more stable and reliable estimate of how the model is likely to perform on unseen data compared to just a single train test split.
More rigorous testing. We define the loss function as measuring error. What's its direct role in training?
It's the target for optimization. The entire goal of training, like with gradient descent, is to adjust the model's parameters, weights, to make the value of the loss function as small as possible on the training. data. It quantifies the badness of the model's predictions and the training process tries to minimize that badness.
The thing we're trying to drive down in stats, how do we know if a result is real or just random chance? Terms like P value,
right? That's hypothesis testing. A p value helps assess the strength of evidence against a null hypothesis, which usually states there's no effect or no difference.
A small p- value suggests the observed result is unlikely if the null hypothesis were true.
And a t test A t test is a specific statistical test often used to compare the means of two groups to see if the difference between them is statistically significant considering the variability within the groups.
Statistical tools for checking significance. How do we measure how similar two things are? You mentioned nearest neighbors. What are the metrics?
There are many. Cosine similarity is great for text data. It measures the angle between vectors ignoring magnitude. Uklitian distance is the straight line as the crow flies distance. Manhattan distance is like walking city blocks. Sum of absolute differences along axis.
Different ways to measure closeness.
Yep. Hamming distance counts differing bits for binary strings. Jakard similarity compares sets based on intersection over union. The right choice depends heavily on the type of data you have.
Got it. We know overfitting is bad. How do we fight it specifically in neural networks?
A very effective technique is dropout.
Dropout.
During training, for each training example, you randomly drop out temporarily set to zero some fraction of the neuron outputs in a layer.
Just turn them off randomly.
Yeah. It forces the network to learn more robust features because it can't rely too heavily on any single neuron. It might be dropped out next time. It encourages redundancy and reduces complex co-adaptations between neurons acting as a strong regularizer.
Forcing teamwork in a way for multiclass classification. How do we get probabilities for all classes that add up to one?
That's usually done with a softmax function.
Soft max.
You apply it to the final layers raw output scores logits. It exp differentiates them making them positive and then normalizes them so they all sum nicely to one. Each output value can then be interpreted as the probability that the input belongs to that specific class.
Turning scores into a proper probability distribution. Okay, fundamental probability again updating beliefs with new evidence.
That's B theorem. It mathematically describe how to revise your estimate of the probability of a hypothesis prior probability based on observing new evidence. likelihood resulting in an updated probability posterior probability foundational for Beijian statistics and certain ML models.
The math for learning from evidence we talked to sigmoid what other activation functions are common in neural nets
the tan function hyperbolic tangent is similar to sigmoid but outputs between minus one and one
very popular for a while more recently the realu function rectified linear unit has become extremely common especially in deep network
andu what's that
it's super simple if the input is positive the output is the input. If the input is negative, the output is zero. It's computationally very cheap and helps combat the vanishing gradient problem to some extent. Variance like leaky railu exists too.
Simple but effective. How do we measure error in regression? Again, specifically the average error,
two big ones. Mean squared error, MSE, calculates the average of the squared differences between predictions and actual values. Squaring penalizes larger errors more. Root mean square error, RMSSE, is just the square root of MSSE.
Why the square root?
RMSSE gives you the error in the same units as your target variable, eg dollars, degrees, which often makes it easier to interpret the typical magnitude of the prediction error.
Okay, error magnitude. How much of the data's variance does our regression model actually explain?
That's measured by R 2, the coefficient of determination. It's a value between 0 and one usually that represents the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable that's predictable from the independent variables. A higher R squar means The model explains more of the variability. An RR of 0.7 means 70% of the variance is explained.
A measure of explanatory power. What about tuning the learning process itself? Things like regularization and learning rate,
right? Crucial hyperparameters, L1 and L2 regularization add penalties to the loss function based on the size of the model weights. This discourages overly complex models and helps prevent overfitting. L1 tends to produce sparse weights. Some become zero. L2 keeps weights small,
penalizing complexity and learning rate.
The learning rate controls how big the steps are when updating weights during gradient descent. Too small and learning takes forever. Too large and you might overshoot the minimum or even diverge. Finding a good learning rate is critical for effective training.
The step size. Got it. Is there a simple probabilistic classifier that works surprisingly well sometimes?
The naive bay classifier.
Naive bays. Why naive?
Because it makes a strong naive assumption that all the input features are independent of each other given the class. This usually isn't true in reality, but the model is simple, fast, and often performs remarkably well, especially on text classification tasks like spam filtering. Simple assumption, practical results. We used loss function and cost function. Are they basically the same?
Pretty much, yeah. People often use them interchangeably. Both refer to the function that measures how bad the model's predictions are compared to the true values, the quantity we want to minimize during training. Sometimes loss refers to the error on a single example and cost to the average loss over the data set. But often they're synonyms.
Measuring the badness. How do we visualize how well a classifier is doing beyond just accuracy?
The confusion matrix is essential.
Confusion matrix.
It's a table showing the counts of true positives, true negatives, false positives, type I error, and false negatives. Type two error. It gives you a detailed breakdown of where the model is making mistakes.
Okay. Seeing the types of errors
and from the confusion matrix, you calculate metrics like precision. How many of the predicted positives were actually positive? And recall, how many of the actual positives did we find? There's often a trade-off between them.
Precision and recall. What about AU?
Area under the ROC curve. AU measures the model's ability to distinguish between positive and negative classes across all possible classification thresholds. An AU of one is perfect, five is random guessing. It's a good summary metric of overall discriminative power. a single number for overall performance. How do we split data for training versus testing? Again,
the standard is the train test split. You carve out a portion of your data, say 20 30% to be the test set. You never train on this set. You train the model only on the remaining training set and then evaluate its final performance on the unseen test set to get an unbiased estimate of generalization.
Keep the test set sacred. Got it. Finding the best hyperparameters like learning rate, regularization, strength seems tricky. How do we do it systematically?
A common method is grid search.
Grid search like searching on a grid.
Exactly. You define a specific set of values you want to try for each hyperparameter. Ag or learning rates 0.1.001 regularization strengths 1.1.01. Grid search then trains and evaluates the model using cross validation on the training set for every single possible combination of these values.
Exhaustive search sounds potentially slow.
It can be especially if you have many hyperparame are many values to try.
Yeah,
but it's methodical. There are more advanced techniques like random search or Beijian optimization too.
Finding the best settings. We talked about outliers. The general field is anomaly detection.
Right? Anomaly detection is focused specifically on identifying data points or events that are rare and significantly different from the norm. Applications in fraud detection, network intrusion, monitoring industrial equipment for failures, medical diagnosis, finding the needle in the haststack,
spotting the unusual. What do we do when data is just missing gaps in the data set.
Dealing with missing values is a common pre-processing step. You can't just feed missing data into most algorithms.
So what are the options?
You could delete the rows or columns with missing values, but you might lose valuable data. A very common approach is imputation filling in the missing values with an estimated value like the mean, median or mode of that feature or using more complex models to predict the missing value based on other features.
Filling in the blanks.
Okay. grouping similar items. We mentioned clustering. What are some specific algorithms?
Two very well-known ones are K means clustering and hierarchical clustering.
A means.
In K means you specify the number of clusters K you want to find beforehand. The algorithm then iteratively assigns points to the nearest cluster center centrid and updates the centrids until things stabilize. It partitions the data into exactly K groups
and hierarchical.
Hierarchical clustering builds a tree of clusters, a dendrogram. doesn't require you to specify K beforehand. You can start with each point as its own cluster and merge the closest ones elomerative or start with one big cluster and split it divisive. You can then cut the tree at different levels to get different numbers of clusters.
Different ways to find groups. What about the really core math operations?
Well, matrix multiplication is absolutely fundamental especially for neural networks. It's how information flows and transforms between layers.
Okay. What about Jacobian and Hessen? Sounds scary.
Ah, they're from calculus. The Jacobi matrix holds all the first order partial derivatives of a vector function. Tells you how the output vector changes with small changes in the input vector. The hessen matrix holds the second order partial derivatives. Tells you about the curvature of a function. Important for understanding and optimizing loss functions.
Advanced math for optimization. How do we find the center of data? Mean, median.
Right? Those are measures of central tendency. The mean is the simple average. The median is the middle value. When you sort the data less sensitive to outliers, the mode is the value that appears most frequently. They give different ideas of what's typical in the data.
Different kinds of average. Let's revisit the activation function in neural nets. Its key role again
introducing nonlinearity. Without it, stacking layers in a neural network wouldn't add any power. The whole thing would still be equivalent to a simple linear model.
Activation functions like realu sigmoid tan allow the network to learn complex nonlinear mappings between inputs and outputs. The nonlinear magic and the whole structure is the
the artificial neural network ANN inspired by the brain. It's a network of interconnected processing units neurons organized in layers. They learn by adjusting the strengths weights of the connections between neurons based on data the foundation of deep learning.
The basic building block, what was the really early simple version?
The perceptron developed back in the 1950s. It's essentially a single neuron with a step activation function capable of learning simple linear separations. A historical but important concept.
The ancestor. For images, the specialized network is
the convolutional neural network or CNN.
CNN's. What makes them special for images?
They use layers with convolutional filters that slide across the image, learning to detect spatial patterns like edges, corners, textures, and then combining those into more complex features in deeper layers. They automatically learn a hierarchy of visual features, making them incredibly effective for image tasks. They also use pooling layers to reduce dimensionality.
Learning visual patterns layer by layer. What about sequences like text or time series?
That's the domain of recurrent neural networks, RNN's. They have connections that loop back on themselves, creating an internal memory or state. This allows them to process sequences element by element and retain information from previous elements to influence the processing of current ones. Great for capturing temporal dependencies,
networks with memory, but they had issues with long sequences.
Yes. The vanishing gradient problem could make it hard for basic RNNs to remember things from long ago. That led to improvements like long short-term memory networks, LSTMs. LSTMs are a type of RNN with a more complex internal structure, including gates that carefully control what information is stored, forgotten, or outputed from their memory cell. This allows them to learn much longer range dependencies effectively. They were state-of-the-art for many sequence tasks for years.
Smarter memory control. But now there's something else often used for language.
Yes, the transformer model. It has really taken over NLP.
Transformers. What's their key innovation?
Instead of processing sequences step by step like RNN's, transformers use a mechanism called attention, specifically self attention. This allows the model to directly weigh the importance of all other words in the sequence when processing a particular word, regardless of distance.
Looking at the whole sentence at once.
In a sense, yes. It captures context much more effectively and allows for much or parallel processing during training leading to huge breakthroughs like GPT models.
The power of attention when feeding images to CNN's. What a padding and pooling. Again,
padding involves adding a border of pixels, usually zeros, around the input image before applying a convolution. It helps control the output size and ensures the filters can process the edges properly. Pooling, like max pooling, is a downsampling step. It takes regions of a feature map and outputs a single value like the maximum, reducing the spatial size and making the representation more robust to small variations
preparing the image borders and shrinking the feature maps. What about AI generating new data besides JANS?
Variational autoenccoders or VAE are another important type of generative model.
VAEs, how do they differ from JANS?
VAEs learn an explicit probability distribution over a latent space, a compressed representation. They consist of an encoder that maps input data to this latent space and a decoder that maps points from the latent space back to data. By sampling from the learned latent distribution and decoding, they can generate new data similar to the training set. They're generally more stable to train than GANs, but sometimes produce slightly blurriier results.
Learning a map of the data's possibilities. Looking ahead, quantum machine learning. What's the idea?
It's still very early days, but the idea is to explore if the principles of quantum computing superposition entanglement could be used to create fundamentally new or faster machine learning algorithms, potentially tackling problems that are currently impossible for classical computers perhaps in optimization or simulating quantum systems. A very exciting long-term research area.
The intersection of quantum physics and AI. Wow. Okay, that was quite a tour. A real deep dive.
It really was. We covered a lot of ground from basic data concepts to complex neural network architectures. Hopefully, it helps connect the dots between these different ideas.
Absolutely. You see how understanding variance leads to thinking about pre-processing, how choosing between regression and classification depends on the goal, how Optimization underlies training everything. It's all interconnected.
Exactly. Having a grasp of these fundamentals gives you that solid base to understand new developments as they happen.
So a final thought for everyone listening, thinking about all these concepts, gradient descent, transformers, reinforcement learning, unsupervised discovery. Which ones do you think might ripple out and have the biggest impact maybe in your field or just in daily life over the next few years?
Yeah, it's worth pondering the ways machines learn side and create are fundamentally changing things. Understanding these core ideas is becoming increasingly important.
techdaily.ai your source for technical information. This podcast is sponsored by Stonefly, your trusted solution provider and adviser in enterprise storage, backup disaster recovery, hypercon converged and VMware, HyperV, Proxmox cluster AI servers, and public and private cloud. Check out stonefly.com or email your project requirements to sales@ stonefly.com